About Us
News
Announcement
Research
Conservation & Horticulture
Public Education
Graduate Study
Scientist
International Cooperation
Resources
Annual Reports
Publications & Papers
Visit XTBG
Societies
XTBG Seminar
Open Positions
4th XSBN Symposium
CAS-SEABRI
PFS-Tropical Asia
Links
 
   Location:Home > Research > Research Progress
Co-diversification patterns differ among figs and pollinating and galling wasps
Author: Peng Yanqiong
ArticleSource:
Update time: 2019-12-09
Close
Text Size: A A A
Print

Pairs of species can interact in manners that are mutually beneficial (mutualism), mutually detrimental (competition), or beneficial to one partner but detrimental to the other (antagonism: predation, herbivory, parasitism). Interactions between mutualists, competitors, and antagonists have contrasting ecological effects that, sustained over generations, can influence micro-and macroevolution. 

In a recent study published in New Phytologist, researchers from Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG) and Beijing Normal University assessed whether the codiversification patterns differ among figs and pollinating and galling wasps.

The researchers compared the cophylogenies of a local sample of figs and pollinating and galling wasps, involving 26 native fig species (Moraceae: Ficus), 26 species of mutualistic (pollinating), and 33 species of parasitic (galling) wasps (Chalcidoidea) from the tropical rainforest at Xishuangbanna, China. 

Using phylogenies for those species based on newly derived gene sequences, they tested whether the overall cophylogenetic congruence and relative frequencies of inferred cospeciation, association duplication, switching, and loss differ for the three pairs of interaction partners. 

They also assessed whether fig–pollinator codiversification differed between monoecious and dioecious fig species. 

They found that the paired phylogenies of pollinators with their mutualists and competitors were significantly congruent, unlike that of figs and their parasites. Just as beneficial interactions between individuals promote coalitions and negative interactions promote dissociation, mutualism tends to facilitate cospeciation, competition promotes interaction loss, and antagonism encourages association switching. 

However, the cophylogenetic patterns observed for figs and their associated pollinating and galling wasps do not adhere strictly to these expectations, likely for two reasons. Heterogeneous features of a particular type of interaction, such as competition, with several other species can foster diverse macroevolutionary outcomes. In addition, threeway interactions between mutualists, competitors, and antagonists may alter the conditions that enable cospeciation and association switching and loss. 

“Our results illustrate the influence of different interspecific interactions on codiversification, while also revealing its dependence on specific characteristics of those interactions”, said Dr. PENG Yanqiong, first author of the study. 

Contact 

PENG Yanqiong  Ph.D Principal Investigator 

Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China           

E-mail: pengyq@xtbg.ac.cn  

 

 

Interaction network between Ficus and pollinating and galling wasps. (Image by PENG Yanqiong) 

 

  Appendix Download
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China
Copyright XTBG 2005-2014 Powered by XTBG Information Center